Apollo vs Lemlist 2026: Complete Comparison (Features, Pricing & Verdict)

Choosing between Apollo.io and Lemlist feels like picking between two excellent but fundamentally different tools. Apollo offers an all-in-one platform with a massive contact database. Lemlist focuses on creative email sequences with superior personalization.

This comparison breaks down exactly where each tool excels, who should choose what, and whether there's a better approach for your outreach entirely.

Key Takeaways

• Apollo.io excels at prospecting with its 275M+ contact database and integrated CRM
• Lemlist leads in email deliverability and creative personalization (images, videos)
• Pricing: Apollo offers better value for data-heavy prospecting; Lemlist wins for dedicated cold email
• LinkedIn automation: Both offer it, but carry account risk—consider alternatives
• Best choice depends on whether you need data sourcing (Apollo) or email execution (Lemlist)

Quick Comparison Table

Feature	Apollo.io	Lemlist
Starting Price	Free / $49/mo	$59/mo
Contact Database	275M+ contacts	None (bring your own)
Email Finder	Built-in	Built-in
Email Sequences	Yes	Yes (advanced)
LinkedIn Automation	Yes	Yes
Personalization	Text variables	Images, videos, text
CRM	Built-in	Integration required
Deliverability Tools	Basic	Advanced (lemwarm)
Best For	Prospecting + outreach	Cold email execution

Apollo.io Overview

What Apollo Does

Apollo.io combines prospecting, engagement, and CRM into one platform. Founded in 2015, it's grown to serve over 1 million users with its comprehensive sales intelligence solution.

Core capabilities:

• Contact database with 275M+ profiles
• Email and phone number discovery
• Multi-channel sequencing (email + LinkedIn)
• Built-in CRM and pipeline management
• Intent data and buying signals

Apollo Pricing (2026)

Plan	Monthly	Annual	Key Features
Free	$0	$0	50 emails/mo, limited data
Basic	$49	$39	500 emails/mo, sequences
Professional	$99	$79	Unlimited emails, integrations
Organization	$149	$119	Advanced analytics, permissions

Note: Email sending credits and data export limits vary by plan.

Apollo Strengths

1. Comprehensive Database: 275M+ contacts eliminates separate data sourcing.

2. All-in-One Platform: Prospecting, sequences, and CRM reduce tool stack complexity.

3. Generous Free Tier: 50 emails monthly and database access for testing.

4. Intent Signals: Identify prospects actively researching solutions.

Apollo Weaknesses

1. Email Deliverability: No dedicated warming tool; users report deliverability issues.

2. Data Accuracy: Varies by region; verified emails sometimes bounce.

3. Learning Curve: Feature density overwhelms new users.

4. LinkedIn Automation Risk: Built-in automation violates LinkedIn Terms of Service.

Lemlist Overview

What Lemlist Does

Lemlist focuses specifically on cold email execution with best-in-class personalization. Founded in 2018, it's built a reputation for deliverability and creative outreach capabilities.

Core capabilities:

• Advanced email sequences
• Dynamic image and video personalization
• Lemwarm (email warm-up tool)
• LinkedIn automation
• Multichannel campaigns

Lemlist Pricing (2026)

Plan	Monthly	Annual	Key Features
Email Starter	$39	$32	Basic email, 100 emails/day
Email Pro	$69	$55	Advanced features, A/B testing
Multichannel Expert	$99	$79	LinkedIn + email, lemwarm
Outreach Scale	$159	$129	Unlimited sending, priority support

Note: LinkedIn automation requires higher tiers; lemwarm included in some plans.

Lemlist Strengths

1. Email Deliverability: Lemwarm warmup tool significantly improves inbox placement.

2. Creative Personalization: Dynamic images with prospect names, company logos.

3. User Experience: Intuitive interface, quick campaign setup.

4. Multichannel Sequences: Native email + LinkedIn workflows.

Lemlist Weaknesses

1. No Contact Database: You must source contacts separately.

2. Higher Starting Cost: No free tier; starts at $39/month.

3. Limited CRM Functionality: Requires external CRM integration.

4. LinkedIn Automation Risk: Same Terms of Service violations as any LinkedIn automation.

Feature Deep Dive

Prospecting & Data

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Contact Database	275M+ built-in	None	Apollo
Email Finding	Included	Included	Tie
Phone Numbers	Included	Limited	Apollo
Data Accuracy	85-90%	N/A	N/A
Intent Signals	Yes	No	Apollo

Winner: Apollo—if you need data sourcing, Apollo's database is the primary differentiator.

Email Sequences

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Sequence Builder	Good	Excellent	Lemlist
A/B Testing	Basic	Advanced	Lemlist
Conditional Logic	Limited	Advanced	Lemlist
Template Library	Basic	Extensive	Lemlist
Send Scheduling	Yes	Yes	Tie

Winner: Lemlist—purpose-built for cold email with superior flexibility.

Personalization

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Text Variables	Yes	Yes	Tie
Image Personalization	No	Yes	Lemlist
Video Personalization	No	Yes	Lemlist
Landing Pages	No	Yes	Lemlist
Dynamic Content	Basic	Advanced	Lemlist

Winner: Lemlist—personalized images and videos significantly improve engagement.

Deliverability

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Email Warmup	No built-in	Lemwarm included	Lemlist
Bounce Detection	Basic	Advanced	Lemlist
Sender Rotation	Limited	Yes	Lemlist
Inbox Monitoring	No	Yes	Lemlist
Deliverability Score	No	Yes	Lemlist

Winner: Lemlist—lemwarm and deliverability tools are significant advantages.

LinkedIn Automation

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Connection Requests	Yes	Yes	Tie
Message Sequences	Yes	Yes	Tie
Profile Views	Yes	Yes	Tie
Safety Features	Basic	Basic	Tie
Account Risk	High	High	Tie (both risky)

Winner: Neither—both violate LinkedIn Terms of Service with account ban risk.

CRM & Integrations

Capability	Apollo	Lemlist	Verdict
Built-in CRM	Yes	No	Apollo
Salesforce Integration	Yes	Yes	Tie
HubSpot Integration	Yes	Yes	Tie
Zapier/Webhooks	Yes	Yes	Tie
Native Integrations	50+	30+	Apollo

Winner: Apollo—built-in CRM reduces tool complexity.

What Most Guides Get Wrong About Apollo vs Lemlist

Myth 1: More Features = Better Tool

Apollo has more features, but that doesn't make it better for everyone. Feature overload creates complexity without proportional value.

Reality: Choose based on your workflow. Data-first users benefit from Apollo. Email-first users benefit from Lemlist.

Myth 2: Built-in LinkedIn Automation Is a Plus

Both tools offer LinkedIn automation, but this "feature" risks your LinkedIn account. LinkedIn actively detects and bans automated behavior.

Reality: Consider LinkedIn automation features as potential liabilities, not benefits.

Myth 3: The Tool With Better Deliverability Wins

Deliverability matters, but it's not everything. Apollo's data + poor deliverability might outperform Lemlist's great deliverability + poor data.

Reality: Your specific bottleneck determines which tool serves you better.

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Apollo.io If:

• You need contact data: No existing lead list or data provider
• You want all-in-one: Reduce tool stack complexity
• Budget is limited: Free tier provides real value
• You need intent signals: Prioritize buyers actively researching
• CRM is needed: Built-in pipeline management

Ideal user: SDRs and AEs building prospect lists from scratch.

Choose Lemlist If:

• You have data: Existing lead lists or separate data source
• Deliverability is critical: Previous campaigns hit spam
• Creative differentiation matters: Stand out with personalized images
• Email is primary channel: Less need for integrated CRM
• You want multichannel: Native email + LinkedIn sequences

Ideal user: Cold email specialists optimizing for reply rates.

Choose Neither If:

• LinkedIn is primary channel: Both tools' LinkedIn automation risks your account
• You prioritize inbound: Neither helps attract leads—they only chase them
• Quality over quantity: Mass outreach doesn't fit your sales model
• Long sales cycles: Relationship-building matters more than sequence volume

Better approach: Authority-based inbound that attracts qualified prospects.

Real Performance Comparison

Based on aggregated user data, here's what typical performance looks like:

Metric	Apollo Users	Lemlist Users
Email Open Rate	35-45%	45-55%
Reply Rate	3-6%	5-10%
Bounce Rate	5-10%	2-4%
LinkedIn Accept Rate*	15-25%	15-25%
Accounts Restricted*	~20% report issues	~20% report issues

*LinkedIn automation carries consistent risk regardless of tool.

Insight: Lemlist's better deliverability translates to measurably higher reply rates.

The Hidden Cost of Both Tools

Cold Outreach Limitations

Both Apollo and Lemlist optimize cold outreach—a declining strategy.

Why cold outreach is declining:

• Email providers increasingly filter automated sequences
• Prospects are overwhelmed with generic pitches
• LinkedIn penalizes automation more aggressively
• Privacy regulations restrict cold contact in many regions

According to Gartner research, buyers complete 57% of their journey before engaging sales. They prefer researching independently—then choosing who to contact.

Response Rate Reality

Cold email typically achieves 3-8% reply rates. Even with great tools, you're reaching 92-97% of prospects who ignore or delete your message.

The math:

• 1,000 cold emails
• 50 opens (5% open rate)
• 5 replies (0.5% total response)
• 1 meeting (0.1% conversion)

Account Risk (LinkedIn)

Both tools offer LinkedIn automation that violates Terms of Service. Users report:

• Temporary restrictions (24-48 hour blocks)
• Feature limitations (connection pauses)
• Permanent suspensions (account disabled)

Losing a LinkedIn account with years of connections is a significant business risk.

How ConnectSafely.ai Offers a Different Approach

Rather than choosing between two cold outreach tools, consider whether cold outreach is the right strategy.

ConnectSafely's inbound approach:

Cold Outreach (Apollo/Lemlist)	Inbound Authority (ConnectSafely)
Chase prospects	Attract prospects
Low response rates (3-8%)	High engagement (30-50% conversation rates)
LinkedIn account risk	Platform-compliant engagement
Race to send volume	Focus on quality visibility
Prospects are cold	Prospects already know you

How it works:

1. Build authority through consistent LinkedIn content
2. Engage strategically with target prospects' content
3. Become recognized in your target market
4. Prospects initiate conversations with you

Result: Instead of 1,000 cold emails generating 5 replies, you generate 10-20 warm inbound conversations monthly from prospects who already want to talk.

This approach requires patience and consistency. It works best for B2B professionals willing to invest in visibility rather than chase volume.

Getting Started

If You Choose Apollo:

1. Start with the free tier to evaluate database quality
2. Focus on intent signals for warmer prospects
3. Use sequences sparingly—avoid automation detection
4. Skip LinkedIn automation—risk outweighs benefit

If You Choose Lemlist:

1. Source quality data separately (Apollo data → Lemlist sequences)
2. Use lemwarm before any cold campaigns
3. Invest in personalized images—they work
4. Skip LinkedIn automation—same risks as Apollo

If You Want an Alternative:

1. Audit your current response rates honestly
2. Calculate cost per qualified conversation
3. Try ConnectSafely for inbound comparison
4. Measure inbound leads vs cold outreach ROI

For more on inbound approaches, see our LinkedIn B2B Lead Generation Playbook.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Apollo.io better than Lemlist for cold email?

It depends on your needs. Apollo is better if you need contact data and an all-in-one platform. Lemlist is better if you have data and prioritize deliverability and personalization. For pure cold email execution, Lemlist typically outperforms.

Can I use Apollo for data and Lemlist for sending?

Yes, this is a common stack. Export leads from Apollo's database, then import into Lemlist for sequences. This combines Apollo's data strength with Lemlist's deliverability advantage.

Which tool has better LinkedIn automation?

Neither. Both offer LinkedIn automation, but both carry significant account risk. LinkedIn actively detects automated behavior and restricts accounts. Consider LinkedIn automation features as liabilities rather than benefits.

What are the main pricing differences between Apollo and Lemlist?

Apollo offers a free tier with limited credits, making it accessible for testing. Paid plans start at $49/month. Lemlist has no free tier, starting at $39/month for email-only or $99/month for multichannel. Annual billing reduces both by approximately 20%.

Should I use Apollo, Lemlist, or something else entirely?

Use Apollo if you need data sourcing and all-in-one simplicity. Use Lemlist if you have data and want maximum email performance. Consider alternatives like ConnectSafely if cold outreach isn't generating acceptable ROI and you're open to inbound strategies.

---

Ready to move beyond cold outreach and start attracting qualified prospects? Try ConnectSafely free and see how inbound authority changes your lead generation economics.